BY BEATRIZ E. AMENDOLA
The
number of women having double, or bilateral, mastectomies in this country is on
the rise.
When
facing breast cancer, deciding which type of surgery to select for early-stage
disease is not easy.
However,
the choice is not between saving your breast and saving your life.
Women
with early-stage breast cancer who have breast-conserving surgery (lumpectomy)
live just as long as those who have a mastectomy. Survival is the same no
matter the surgical choice.
If breast
cancer is diagnosed early and there are no genetic factors that can change the
course of the disease, we can reach 95-percent cure rates with appropriate,
conservative treatment.
So why
are we seeing so many patients go for a mutilating procedure, with chances of
severe complications?
Could it
be vanity and the enticement of getting a tummy-tuck and a breast augmentation
at the same time? Advances in plastic surgery promise more attractive
artificial breasts than years ago.
Unfortunately
many women do not think about the consequences of such a drastic approach.
Breast
cancer is not a local disease — it is systemic, and that is one of the reasons
that we need to use some form of systemic hormones or chemotherapy to avoid
mastectomies.
For a
small number of women, bilateral mastectomies are necessary because of cancer
in both breasts or because they have an aggressive type of cancer.
However,
most double mastectomies are done on the breast with cancer, and a prophylactic
mastectomy of the healthy breast.
There are
many scenarios in which the decision to proceed with bilateral mastectomies is
based upon unfounded fear or an inaccurate assessment of the risks and benefits
a woman may face.
Clearly a
major factor is “the Angelina Jolie effect.”
She made
her BRCA1 gene mutation public in 2013 when she detailed her path to a
bilateral mastectomy after learning that this mutation carries an 87 percent
risk for developing breast cancer.
However,
the BRAC1/2 genes linked to breast cancer are rare (0.25 percent).
In the
United States, only one in 800 women in the general population is affected by
this mutation.
Current
guidelines discourage bilateral mastectomies for most women and recommend it
only be considered on a case-by-case basis for women at high risk of bilateral
breast cancer.
These
include women who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, or those who have a higher
risk of contralateral breast cancer.
It’s
important for women to always get a second opinion and discuss the options with
specialists: surgeon and medical and/or radiation oncologist. Then they can
make an educated decision.
It’s
interesting that when shopping, women shop around, looking for a variety of
choices, be it a new car or clothing.
Yet when
dealing with breast cancer, most women see only one surgeon and, perhaps, a
plastic surgeon without getting a second or even third opinion.
It also
helps to talk to other women who have “been there” and can tell you of their
own experiences.
There
have been many advances in the field of radiation oncology for breast-cancer
patients.
Brachytherapy
is an alternative to conventional irradiation for early breast cancer.
Only part
of the breast is treated and a shorter course (usually five to seven days) is
used as opposed to conventional external radiation treatment that usually
requires five weeks to six weeks of daily radiation treatments.
This
treatment delivers radiation to the area where it is needed most with minimal
radiation exposure to the adjacent normal tissues reducing the potential for
side effects.
The
decision to have bilateral mastectomies should not be made without considerable
thought and research.
In my
view, women should proceed cautiously and think carefully about the advantages
and disadvantages of all the medical choices involved so they can lead a happy
and healthy life post cancer.